Raymond Yeung Tax Consultant * former Assessor of IRD

飛鴻稅務顧問 * 前稅局評稅主任 楊輝洪 主理

yeungfhr@yahoo.com.hk * R 1/F Rose Garden, 23 Hang Tau, Sheung Shui

Tel:  94735846 * 會面可在九龍塘又一城 * 稅務顧問收費每小時$400

Profits Tax - When is an expenditure incurred?

Section 16(1) allows expenses “incurred” during the basis period. The word “incurred” is not defined in the Inland Revenue Ordinance. 

From case law, “incurred” does not completely mean "paid". In general, an expenditure is incurred when the claimant has committed a definite or absolute liability and that the amount has been ascertained on an accurate basis, even though the amount of liability may not yet be determined. 

In the case of So Kai-tong Stanley trading as Stanley So & Company v CIR the judge said: "the appellant relies on Lo & Lo v. CIR, in which it was stated that deductions are not confined to a disbursement, but included an obligation to pay. What the appellant has overlooked is that the obligation to pay must be an accrued liability, which is undischarged .... It is therefore imperative to identify the legal basis for giving rise to the liability to pay. The appellant says that his firm will be obliged to pay up if Yam & So brings a claim against it in a court of law. This is a circular argument because it does not address the core issue of why the appellant's firm will be adjudged to be liable to Yam & So's claim. It is not the appellant's case that the parties had entered into a legally binding agreement on the matter. Indeed no such material had ever been adduced to explain the nature of the obligation. The appellant has throughout not identified the basis upon which the alleged obligation is founded. The Board is entitled to reject the contention that the appellant's firm was under an obligation to pay make good the loss or liability incurred by Yam & So. There is no basis for challenging the Board's conclusion that the retrospective fixation of the amount of office facilities charges was not related to a commercial agreement…” Click here for more about the case. In short, in order that an expenditure paid after the end of the basis period to be "incurred" during the year of assessment, there must be a "legal liability" to pay the amount by the end of the basis period.

Click here to see the court comments on "incurred" in the case Lo & Lo v CIR.  

Accruals for rent, interest, insurance, lighting and heating, … etc. in respect of the accounting period are acceptable. 

A mere commitment, without an established and definite legal liability, to pay a future debt does not satisfy the requirement of "incurred". A provision for contingent liability is not deductible either. Neither is a transfer to a general reserve against possible future expenditure or loss a deductible expenditure.

 

問服務收費每小時400 元 收費詳情   稅務補習逐堂收費 收費詳情

Raymond Yeung 為你提供  香港稅須知實用稅務課程HK Taxation  私人補習

網站資料據前評稅主任楊輝洪在稅局的經驗而寫

 飛鴻文選  書刊下載  法律常識  文件範本  見工英語  學好英文  成功智慧  聯絡網主

按此收聽 飛鴻自白 (1)   飛鴻自白 (2)    飛鴻自白(3)    飛鴻講稅務

按此下載  稅務須知  實用英語  生活哲學  認識稅局    HK Tax Tips

稅務教學         筆記下載        專題補習       稅務顧問服務